Legal Opinion

Floyd v. Carlisle Const. Co., Inc.

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1988No. 86-SC-862-DGPublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANCE, Justice.

The question is whether a defendant in a tort claim is entitled to an instruction which would allow the jury to apportion a part of the plaintiffs damage against a joint tort-feasor with whom the plaintiff has settled but who was not named as a party defendant by the plaintiff and whom the defendant did not name as a third-party defendant.

The movant, William Floyd, was injured in a collision between an automobile driven by Steven Whittamore and a road grader operated by Stephen Wood and owned by Carlisle Construction Company. Floyd settled his claim against Whittamore and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hilen v. HaysKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Orr v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
  3. Prudential Life Insurance Co. v. MoodyKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Nix v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1975
  5. Daulton v. ReedKentucky Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Barnes v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  2. CertainTeed Corp. v. DexterKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Dix & Associates Pipeline Contractors, Inc. v. KeyKentucky Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Sand Hill Energy, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1989

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API