Floyd v. Carlisle Const. Co., Inc.
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANCE, Justice.
The question is whether a defendant in a tort claim is entitled to an instruction which would allow the jury to apportion a part of the plaintiffs damage against a joint tort-feasor with whom the plaintiff has settled but who was not named as a party defendant by the plaintiff and whom the defendant did not name as a third-party defendant.
The movant, William Floyd, was injured in a collision between an automobile driven by Steven Whittamore and a road grader operated by Stephen Wood and owned by Carlisle Construction Company. Floyd settled his claim against Whittamore and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hilen v. HaysKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
- Orr v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
- Prudential Life Insurance Co. v. MoodyKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
- Nix v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1975
- Daulton v. ReedKentucky Supreme Court · 1976
3Cited by49 opinions
- Barnes v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- CertainTeed Corp. v. DexterKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
- Dix & Associates Pipeline Contractors, Inc. v. KeyKentucky Supreme Court · 1990
- Sand Hill Energy, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2002
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1989
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.