Legal Opinion
Andrews v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided May 13, 1966No. 163-64PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLaramore, Judge
The facts in this case are identical to those presented in Akerson, et al. v. United States, ante, p. 551, this day decided. Plaintiffs are officers of the uniformed services who retired prior to June 1, 1958. For the period from June 1, 1958 to October 1, 1963, they received retired pay based on the active duty pay scales in effect on May 31,1958, plus a six percent cost-of-living increase. They claim for this period additional retired pay to be based on the active duty “basic pay” provided in the Act of May 20, 1958, 72 Stat. 122. Plaintiff’s claim, is not predicated on statutory…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Heidt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
- United States v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Leonard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Byrd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- William O. Schism and Robert Reinlie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Sebastian v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Puglisi v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
- Norman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- John J. Costello v. United States of America, Floyd E. Stevens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.