Legal Opinion
Norman v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided March 15, 1968No. 295-62; No. 321-62; No. 336-62; No. 256-64; No. 351-64; No. 313-64PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDurfee, Judge
Each of the plaintiffs herein seeks to recover the difference between the active duty pay he would have received as an *44officer in the Air Force if be bad not been retired early under tbe provisions of the so-called White Charger Act and the retired pay he has received since the date of his retirement under that Act. We conclude that none of the plaintiffs is entitled to recover.
The “White Charger Act”1 derived its name from an observation that this legislation went through Congress “like a White Charger.” The Act permitted early mandatory retirement of not to exceed 20 percent of officers in…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Panama Refining Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- National Broadcasting Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Kobach v. United States Election Assistance CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- In Re Marriage of KarlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- United States v. SumrallCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- Crispino v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
- Townsend v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.