Legal Opinion

Poots v. Motorist Insurance Companies

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 10, 1986No. 12634PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuillin, J.

This uninsured motorist insurance case presents two questions. Who has the burden of proof to prove an express rejection of uninsured motorist coverage? Does a written application for insurance which provides less uninsured motorist coverage than liability coverage constitute, without more, an express rejection of uninsured motorist coverage equivalent to liability coverage? The trial court held that the insurer has the burden of proof and that such an application does not constitute an express rejection. We affirm.

A declaratory judgment action was brought by and on behalf of Debra and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Abate v. Pioneer Mutual Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Ady v. West American InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Grange Mutual Casualty Co. v. VolkmannOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Brady v. Universal Underwriters Ins. GroupOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Chapman v. Knickerbocker Amusement Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1949

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Silver v. SlusherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Larson v. BathCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1990
  3. Braden v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Shindollar v. Erie InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Anderson v. Hartford Underwriters InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API