Legal Opinion

Rogers v. County of Niagara

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly dismissed plaintiff’s Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action. Plaintiff was injured when the wall of an excavation trench caved in on him. Labor Law § 240 (1) does not impose liability in favor of a worker injured in the collapse of an excavation trench (see, Kelleher v First Presbyt. Church, 158 AD2d 946, lv dismissed 75 NY2d 947; Staples v Town of Amherst, 146 AD2d 292, 301). The court erred, however, in dismissing plaintiff’s Labor Law § 241 (6)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Staples v. Town of AmherstAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. Schwalm v. County of MonroeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Kelleher v. First Presbyterian ChurchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. Shoemaker v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Allen v. Hodorowski and DeSantis Building Contractors, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Misseritti v. Mark IV Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Rivas v. Seward Park Hous. Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  4. Pinheiro v. Montrose Improvement DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API