Legal Opinion

Pinheiro v. Montrose Improvement District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 1, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Casey, J.

Appeal (transferred to this Court by order of the Appellate Division, Second Department) from an order of the Supreme Court (Silverman, J.), entered July 1, 1994 in Westchester County, which denied plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment against defendants Montrose Improvement District, City of Peekskill and Hazen and Sawyer, P. C. on the issue of liability under Labor Law § 240 (1).

While working in a trench as part of a project involving the installation of a pipeline, plaintiff Joao M. Pinheiro was injured when he was struck by falling earth and stones. Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Hamann v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Rogers v. County of NiagaraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lysiak v. Murray Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Vitaliotis v. Village of SaltaireAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Rivas v. Seward Park Hous. Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API