Legal Opinion

Simpson v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 7, 2015No. 22/14PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarbera, C.J.

It is well understood that the federal and Maryland constitutions prohibit the prosecutor in a criminal case from making an adverse comment upon the defendant’s failure to testify. Griffin v. California, 380 U.S. 609, 85 S.Ct. 1229, 14 L.Ed.2d 106 (1965) (holding that the prosecutor’s comment during closing argument concerning the defendant’s failure to testify violated the Self-Incrimination Clause of the Fifth Amendment); Smith v. State, 367 Md. 348, 358, 787 A.2d 152 (2001) (holding that the prosecutor’s comment during closing argument violated Article 22 of the Maryland Declaration of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Newton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  2. Fuentes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  3. Winston, Mayhew & Cannon v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  4. State v. SmithCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  5. Walls v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API