Newton v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.
In posteonvietion cases, we must often navigate the fine line between a defendant’s right to a fair trial on the one hand and the legal system’s interest in finality on the other. Today we are faced with the question of whether a posteonvietion petitioner’s trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective in consenting to the presence of an alternate juror during deliberations. ■ We also address whether his appellate counsel was ineffective in failing to argue that the alternate juror’s presence was plain error.
FACTS AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On the evening of September 20, 2004, Jerrell Patillo…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Robert Krogmann v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- Kazadi v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Watts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- State v. SyedCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
- Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.