Legal Opinion

Hall v. Dare

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1927No. 19833. Department TwoPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff, Hall, commenced this action in the-superior court of Kitsap county seeking recovery of a large flag pole from the defendant, Dare. The plaintiff, by the usual replevin proceedings, caused the pole to be seized by the sheriff, and no re-delivery bond being furnished by the defendant, the pole was accordingly given by the sheriff into the possession of the plaintiff, who has retained it pending this action. A trial upon the merits in the superior court, sitting without a jury, resulted in findings and judgment awarding the pole to the defendant, and directing delivery of it to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Snedeker v. . WarringNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  2. Filley v. ChristopherWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Chase v. Tacoma Box Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Ballard v. Alaska Theatre Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Cutler v. KellerWashington Supreme Court · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Strong v. Sunset Copper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Nearhoff v. RuckerWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. HawthorneWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Western Ag Land Partners v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  5. Strain v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API