Legal Opinion

Nearhoff v. Rucker

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1930No. 22185. Department TwoPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This action was brought by respondents to recover from appellants certain articles of property and the cost of restoring them in the place from which they had been taken.

After trial to a jury, some conflicts in evidence being resolved in favor of respondents, a verdict was rendered granting respondents three itemized accounts of $410 on account of timber; $1,260 on account of the monorail; and $112 on account of trolley wire, aggregating $1,782.

The complaint alleged that the timber, monorail and trolley, which was a part of the monorail, belonged to and was a part of an extremely long narrow…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Maryland Realty Co. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Filley v. ChristopherWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Cherry v. ArthurWashington Supreme Court · 1893
  4. German Savings & Loan Society v. WeberWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Turner v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Blaney v. International Ass'n of MacHinistsWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Department of Revenue v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Strong v. Sunset Copper Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Westinghouse Electric Supply Co. v. HawthorneWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  5. City of Walla Walla v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1938

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API