Legal Opinion
Rospatch Jessco Corp. v. Chrysler Corp.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided August 11, 1995No. 1:93-cr-00047PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Rospatch Jessco Corporation (“Rospatch”) filed this action pursuant to Sections 107 and 113 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9607 and 9613, seeking to recover costs which it incurred in responding to alleged releases of hazardous substances at its Dow-agiac, Michigan, manufacturing plant (“the Dowagiac plant”), and for a declaratory judgment that the defendants are liable for future costs that it may incur as a result of those releases. Defendant Chrysler Corporation…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fmc Corporation v. United States Department of Commerce Ronald Brown, Secretary of Commerce, in His Official Capacity United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Fleet Factors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lockheed Martin Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2015
- Miami-Dade County v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2004