Legal Opinion

Cromwell v. Anderson Furniture Co.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 20, 1963No. 3315PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge.

The question presented is whether there is sufficient evidence to sustain a finding charging the husbancl with liability for furniture sold to his wife. The suit was brought against both husband and wife and a default judgment was taken against the wife. The husband contested the claim and he appeals from an adverse trial finding.

The husband’s liability for obligations incurred by his wife may arise in two situations:

“* * * One is when the wife has express or apparent authority to pledge her husband’s credit; the second arises when the husband neglects, fails or refuses…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ford v. S. Kann Sons Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Richards v. KaplanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Hollywood Credit Clothing Co. v. LaredoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Stein v. Woodward & LothropDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API