Legal Opinion

Richards v. Kaplan

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 1958No. 2158PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

This appeal by a husband involves the question of his liability for dental services furnished his wife. From a review of the pleadings and brief statement of proceedings and evidence, the factual situation appears as follows. Appellant and his wife reside in New York but he makes frequent business trips to Washington and his wife often accompanies him. She was having extensive dental work done by a Washington dentist, Dr. Birthright, and he referred her to appellees, who are also dentists, for certain spécial work. This work was done and a charge of $100 made therefor.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ford v. S. Kann Sons Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. King v. KingDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Joseph M. Stone, of the Will of Elna H. Wharton, Deceased v. Agnes Wharton BrewsterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  3. Hollywood Credit Clothing Co. v. LaredoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Cromwell v. Anderson Furniture Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API