Legal Opinion

Hollywood Credit Clothing Co. v. Laredo

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 22, 1958No. 2212PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAYTON, Acting Judge.

The question is whether a merchant produced sufficient evidence to create liability on the part of a husband for merchandise sold to his wife. The suit was filed against both husband and wife, and default judgment was taken against the wife. The husband contested the claim, and as to him there was a trial, resulting in finding in his favor, entered at the end of plaintiff’s case.

According to the very brief statement of evidence, 1 this was plaintiff’s case: The wife, called as plaintiff’s witness, identified a sales contract bearing her signature, “Mrs. Mary V. Laredo,”…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Richards v. KaplanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
  2. Stein v. Woodward & LothropDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. Anderson Furniture Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. Hollywood Credit Clothing Co. v. TurnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API