United States v. Southern Pac. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Utah.
1Opinion of the Court
ADAMS, Circuit Judge.
This was a civil action in eight counts to recover penalties for that number of violations of the safety appliance laws of the United States. Act March 2, 1893, c. 196, 27 Stat. 531 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3174); Act April 1, 1896, c. 87, *40829 stat. 85; Act March 2, 1903, c. 976, 32 Stat. 943 (U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1907, p. 885). These statutes make unlawful the use of any locomotive engine in moving interstate traffic unless it is equipped with a power-driving wheel brake and an appliance for operating the train brake system, and render unlawful the hauling or using of any…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- United States v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- United States v. Denver & R. G. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
3Cited by8 opinions
- Watson v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas · 1909
- Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1915
- Southern Ry. Co. v. SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- The Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.