Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
in Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska.
1Opinion of the Court
AMIDON, District Judge.
This action was commenced by the government to recover penalties under Act March 2, 1893, c. 196, § 1, 27 Stat. 531 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3174), as amended by Act March 2, 1903, c. 976, § 1, 32 Stat. 943 (U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1907, p.886). The complaint alleges that:
“The defendant, on or about June 7, 1906, hauled on its line of railroad one car, to wit, its own No. 69581; said car being an empty car and generally used in the movement of interstate traffic, said car, at the time of the viola-*237•■Ion of the nbovo net, being consigne»! from Qinalia, in Ibe state of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Schlemmer v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Johnson v. Southern Pac. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- United States v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. R.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1906
3Cited by10 opinions
- Southern Ry. Co. v. SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
- Erie R. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917
- Norfolk & W. Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1910
- The Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- United States v. Southern Pac. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.