Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Iowa.
1Opinion of the Court
HOOK, Circuit Judge.
This was an action by the United States against the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company, a railroad corporation engaged in interstate and local commerce, to recover penalties for four separate violations of the safety appliance statute. Act March 2, 1893, c. 196, 27 Stat. 531 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3174), amended by the acts of April 1, 1896, c. 87, 29 Stat. 85, and March 2, 1903, c. 976, 32 Stat. 943 (U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1907, p. 885). Judgment was rendered against the company upon each of the four. counts of the petition, but the only complaint here is of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Schlemmer v. Buffalo, Rochester & Pittsburg Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Voelker v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Iowa · 1902
- United States v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Watson v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas · 1909
- Erie R. v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1910
- Chicago Junction Ry. Co. v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1909
- Otos v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Southern Ry. Co. v. SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.