Legal Opinion

Lederer v. Viking Freight, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 1, 2004No. 01-06919; A119809PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Employer petitions for reconsideration of our opinion in Lederer v. Viking Freight, Inc., 193 Or App 226, 89 P3d 1199 (2004), raising three arguments. We allow the petition but write only to address employer’s third argument. We adhere to our opinion as modified below.

In our description of the underlying facts, we explained that, on April 5, 2000, employer issued a notice of closure on claimant’s first claim, a lumbar strain. Along with the notice of closure, employer “issued an updated notice of acceptance, specifying the lumbar strain as the accepted condition.” Id. at 230. Several months…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lederer v. Viking Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. SAIF Corp. v. Donahue-BirranCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. Scott v. Liberty Northwest InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. Griffin v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. Scott v. Liberty Northwest Insurance Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. Sparling v. Providence Health System OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API