Legal Opinion

Scott v. Liberty Northwest Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 31, 2014No. 1100306; A150234PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEgan, J.

The question in this workers’ compensation case is whether claimant, who was medically stationary on an underlying and compensable low-back claim, was nonetheless entitled to begin receiving temporary disability benefits on an accepted claim for an omitted medical condition. We vacate and remand for reconsideration the Workers’ Compensation Board’s order concluding that claimant was not entitled to them.

The pertinent facts are undisputed. While working for Liberty Northwest’s (Liberty) insured as a certified nursing assistant on January 29, 2007, claimant suffered a work-related injury to her…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lederer v. Viking Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. Johansen v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Lederer v. Viking Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. Johansen v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Scott v. Liberty Northwest Insurance Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Bledsoe v. City of Lincoln CityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  3. Halton Co. v. NacosteCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. Rodriguez v. Keystone RV - Thor IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API