Legal Opinion
Bullfrog Films, Inc. v. Wick
District Court, C.D. California
Decided October 24, 1986No. CV 85-7930 AWTPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TASHIMA, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in this action are independent film makers, film distributors and a membership association. They allege that the United States Information Agency (the “USIA” or “Agency”), violated their constitutional rights, which caused them economic injury, by refusing to certify their films as “educational” under the Agreement For Facilitating The International Circulation of Visual And Auditory Materials of An Educational, Scientific And Cultural Character, 1 an international treaty known as the Beirut Agreement. The Court concludes that the USIA regulations, on which…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Yahoo! Inc. v. La Ligue Contre Le Racisme Et L'antisemitismeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Bullfrog Films, Inc. v. Charles Z. Wick, Director, United States Information AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Bullfrog Films, Inc. v. Charles Z. Wick, Director, United States Information AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Finley v. National Endowment for the ArtsDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.