Legal Opinion
Yahoo! Inc. v. La Ligue Contre Le Racisme Et L'antisemitisme
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 12, 2006No. 01-17424PublishedCited by 498 opinions
1Per curiam
A majority of the en banc court (Judge W.A. Fletcher, joined by Chief Judge Schroeder and Judges Hawkins, Fisher, Gould, Paez, Clifton, and Bea) concludes that the district court had personal jurisdiction over the defendants. Of that majority, three judges (Chief Judge Schroeder, and Judges W.A. Fletcher and Gould) conclude that the action should be dismissed for lack of ripeness. Five judges (Judge Fisher, joined by Judges Hawkins, Paez, Clifton, and Bea) conclude that the case is ripe for adjudication. The three remaining judges (Judges Ferguson, O’Scannlain, and Tashima) conclude that the…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by498 opinions
- Dudnikov v. Chalk & Vermilion Fine Arts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Mavrix Photo, Inc. v. Brand Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Learjet, Inc. v. Oneok, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Tamburo v. DworkinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- CollegeSource, Inc. v. AcademyOne, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
493 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.