Fenske v. Nelson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the municipal court for the city of Duluth to recover $89.60, a balance alleged to be due on account of merchandise sold and delivered by plaintiffs to defendant. The cause was tried before Gearhart, Special Judge, without a jury, and judgment was ordered in favor of plaintiffs for $30.85. From an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, and from the judgment, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
Action in the municipal court of Duluth for the recovery of *2$39.60, on account of merchandise soJd by plaintiffs to defendant. Trial by court without a jury. Judgment for the plaintiffs, from which defendant appealed. The assignments of error relate (a) to the sufficiency of the findings of fact to support the judgment; (b) the sufficiency of the evidence to support such findings; (c) the correctness of the ruling of the trial court as to the admissibility of certain evidence.
1. The first question — the sufficiency of the findings to sustain the judgment — is to be determined by ascertaining…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- St. Paul Trust Co. v. St. Paul Chamber of CommerceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stevens v. Minneapolis Fire Department Relief Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Clark v. Thorpe Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Kehrer v. SeemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931