Legal Opinion

Kehrer v. Seeman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 27, 1931No. 28,301Published

1Opinion of the CourtOlsen, J.

Appeal by defendant from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

Plaintiff as administrator of the estate of Theresa Kehrer, his wife, now deceased, brings the action to recover the purchase price of a tract of land claimed to have been sold and conveyed by decedent and her husband to defendant, the conveyance having been, made to one .Minna K. Seeman at the request and direction of defendant.

There is some dispute as to the' correct description of the land sold and as to the title of some small portions thereof, to be hereafter considered. That aside, it is undisputed that defendant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Turner v. FrybergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  2. Bahr v. Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Kent v. CostinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  4. Mann v. LambSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  5. Hayes v. HayesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API