St. Paul Trust Co. v. St. Paul Chamber of Commerce
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendants Frederick Driscoll and others from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Willis, J., denying a motion on a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
The subject-matter of this action is a promissory note for $8,000, dated January 14, 1890, due in one year, made by defendant corporation to the plaintiff, and a guaranty of its payment indorsed thereon, and signed by the appellants. The guaranty is in these words: “For value received, we, the undersigned, hereby guaranty the payment of the principal and interest on the within note. Sureties:” [Signatures.]
The complaint alleges the making and delivery of the note and guaranty to the plaintiff, and demands judgment against the maker and guarantors for the amount of the note, less payments. The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Washington Slate Co. v. BurdickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Danforth v. SempleIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- Wheaton v. WheelerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
3Cited by7 opinions
- State Bank v. Mutual Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Commercial Savings Bank of Carroll v. DunningSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- Goodhue County National Bank v. FlemingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Fenske v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Farmers Mer. Nat. Bk. of Cannon Falls v. DoffingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.