Legal Opinion

State v. Radcliffe

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1988No. 87-645PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

As the result of an effort to initiate an amendment to the Constitution of this state so as to permit a state-run lottery, defendant-appellee, Walter H. Radcliffe, was charged with hiring and paying a salary to circulators of initiative petitions, once on June 26,1986, and again on July 2,1986, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 32-705 (Cum. Supp. 1986) and 32-713 (Reissue 1984). The district court sustained Radcliffe’s motion to quash the information on the ground, inter alia, that the portion of § 32-705 Radcliffe is charged with having violated abridges his freedom of speech and thus…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Boston v. BellottiSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Meyer v. GrantSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. State v. MonasteroNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Debney v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  5. State v. CountryNebraska Supreme Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. FellmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Pony Lake School District 30 v. State Committee for Reorganization of School DistrictsNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. MonasteroNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State Ex Rel. Labedz v. BeermannNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. of America v. State Board of EqualizationNebraska Supreme Court · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API