Legal Opinion
State v. Monastero
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided June 17, 1988No. 87-387, 87-388, 87-389, 87-390, 87-391PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShanahan, J.
In separate informations filed in the district court for Douglas County, the State charged the defendants, Joe Monastero, Marlene “Mardy” McCullough, Sam Katzman, William M. Katzman, and Bernice Labedz, with two counts of falsely swearing to a signature upon an initiative petition, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 32-713 (Reissue 1984). The charges arose from activity relative to the initiative petition to provide a state lottery. Each defendant filed the identical motion to quash the information, alleging that Neb. Rev. Stat. § 32-705 (Cum. Supp. 1986) and § 32-713, when read jointly,…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. KipfNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. CrowdellNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- Bosselman, Inc. v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. FellmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- Kwik Shop, Inc. v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.