Legal Opinion
State v. Hamilton
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided January 17, 1991No. 75717PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
574 So.2d 124 (1991)
STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
Thewell Eugene HAMILTON, Appellee.
No. 75717.
Supreme Court of Florida.
January 17, 1991.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Mark C. Menser, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellant.
Robert T. Adams, Jr., Marianna, for appellee.
KOGAN, Justice.
The state appeals an order granting a new penalty phase in the capital trial of Thewell Eugene Hamilton. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. See § 924.07(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (1989) (state may appeal new-trial order). The sole issue in this case is whether the jury's recommendation during…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- United States v. Paul C. PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Salvatore Joseph Marino v. Dan Vasquez, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Wright v. Illinois & Mississippi Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1866
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Larzelere v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- Baptist Hosp. of Miami, Inc. v. MalerSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- McKinney v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
- Marshall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Leonard Patrick Gonzalez, Jr. v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2014
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.