Legal Opinion

Marshall v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 12, 2003No. SC00-1186PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

854 So.2d 1235 (2003)

Matthew MARSHALL, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. SC00-1186.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 12, 2003.

Rehearing Denied September 8, 2003.

Melissa Minsk Donoho, Special Assistant CCRC-South, and Leor Veleanu, Staff Attorney, CCRC-South, Office of the Capital Collateral Regional Counsel-South, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Debra Rescigno, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, FL, for Appellee.

2Per curiam

Matthew Marshall, a prisoner under sentence of death, appeals the trial court's denial of his motion for postconviction…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Lewis; Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Concurrence · Quince.

3Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by51 opinions

  1. Fleshner v. Pepose Vision Institute, P.C.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  2. Rodriguez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  3. Boyd v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  4. Dufour v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  5. Arbelaez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API