Legal Opinion

United States v. Paul C. Perkins

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 19, 1984No. 83-3566PublishedCited by 198 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Paul C. Perkins was convicted of conspiracy to obstruct justice in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 1 and obstruction of jus tice in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1503. 2 Perkins appeals, claiming that the indictment was invalid, that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s verdict, and that the trial court erred in denying him a new trial on the basis of jury misconduct. We find that, because of juror misconduct, appellant is entitled to a new trial; therefore, we reverse and remand.

1. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The Washington Shores Savings and Loan Association…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by198 opinions

  1. Patrick James Jeffries v. Tana Wood, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. BoylanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  3. Russell A. Tinsley v. Bob BorgCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. CaporaleCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. James Easter, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992

193 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API