Legal Opinion

St. Cyr v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 9, 2013No. 4D11-583PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

Ocelyn St. Cyr appeals the denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. We affirm as to appellant’s claim that the trial court erred in not evaluating his mental health status before sentencing. This claim is not proper for a rule 3.800(a) motion. See Potter v. State, 769 So.2d 519, 520 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000).

Appellant also claimed that the trial court could not revoke his “youthful offender status” following revocation of community control. We remand as to this claim because, as the state concedes, the trial court failed to attach records to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lee v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  2. Blacker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  3. Christian v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  4. Rogers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  5. Boynton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Jimmy Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. Robin Eustache v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
  3. Lachenauer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  4. Johnie Earl Larkins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  5. Gianni Passino v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API