Legal Opinion

Oregon State Police Officers Ass'n v. State

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1989No. TC A8508-05041; CA A46148; SC S35924PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*533VAN HOOMISSEN, J.

The primary issue in this case is whether the political activity clause of ORS 181.400(2) violates Article I, section 8, of the Oregon Constitution. It does. A secondary issue is whether plaintiffs are entitled to attorney fees as prevailing parties because they also pled a claim under 42 USC § 1983. They are not.

I

ORS 181.400(2) provides in part:

“Notwithstanding any other law, no member of the state police shall in any way be active or participate in any political contest of any general or special election, except to cast the ballot of the member of the state police.”1

Plaintif…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. State v. RobertsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Sterling v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Deras v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Cooper v. Eugene School District No. 4JOregon Supreme Court · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. GeistOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Barcik v. KubiaczykOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of FadeleyOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Town of Flower Mound v. Stafford Estates Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  5. Nutbrown v. MunnOregon Supreme Court · 1991

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API