Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Wyman

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1972PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaniel G. Albert, J.

Petitioners Murphy and Licardi in this

article 78 proceeding are designated “ employable ” recipients of public assistance in Nassau County and are trainees in public supported training programs. They seek to enjoin the respondents, Commissioner Wyman, Commissioner Shuart, and their respective State and County Social Services Departments from implementing a change in the manner of payment of shelter assistance which in effect would cause petitioners to receive during the first two weeks of each month, not the entire shelter check for the month, which they have to date been receiving on the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Kovarsky v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. Young v. ShuartNew York Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Harris v. WymanNew York Supreme Court · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cisco v. LavineNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Norton v. LavineNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Baumes v. LavineNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Mace v. Van LakeNew York Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API