Legal Opinion
Mace v. Van Lake
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 12, 1972PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBertram Harnett, J.
Where the Government has undertaken to subsidize child care to encourage employment opportunity for beneficiaries of social service programs, may it do so by use of “ vouchers ” rather than cash payment? We believe it can. -
The Nassau County Department of Social Services, under the supervision of the New York State Department of Social Services, has for many years paid for child care so that the parents of young children can be trained or employed, pursuant to a Federally reimbursed Work Incentive Program (WIN) (U. S. Code, tit. 42, § 602, subd. [a]; Code of Fed. Beg., tit. 45, § 220.35). The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Matter of Pruzan v. ValentineNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Young v. ShuartNew York Supreme Court · 1971
- Summers v. WymanNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- Murphy v. WymanNew York Supreme Court · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hurlbut v. WhalenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- City of Albuquerque v. CamposNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974