Legal Opinion

Wisler v. Tomb

California Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1915No. L.A. No. 3448PublishedCited by 14 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Defendant demurred generally and specially to plaintiff’s second amended complaint. The demurrer was sustained, plaintiff refused to amend and judgment for defendant was entered accordingly. This appeal is taken by plaintiff from said judgment.

Plaintiff averred in his unverified complaint that he was the duly appointed, acting, and qualified trustee of the trust estate of Thomas Tomb Harbeson, a minor. He sued as such trustee and sought judgment against defendant in her capacity as executrix of the last will of Thomas B. Tomb, deceased. According to the allegations of the complaint the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. ForbesIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Beebe v. CoffinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Tracy v. AlvordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Rickey Land & Cattle Co. v. GladerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Herbert v. LankershimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Gilman v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1930
  3. McConnell v. Bible InstituteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Coon v. ShryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Patterson v. ChapmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API