Legal Opinion

Tracy v. Alvord

California Supreme Court

Decided October 26, 1897No. S. F. No. 750PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order refusing a new trial. John Hunt, Judge. Tbe facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, C.

Defendants’ testator, J. C. Wilmerding, died February 20, 1894. About one year previously he made and signed a paper writing having the form of a promissory note for ten thousand dollars, payable sixty days from its date to the order of Felix Tracy, the plaintiff. It is claimed on the latter’s behalf in this action (which is founded on said note as a demand against the estate of said deceased) that the instrument was delivered by the testator to a third person for plaintiff’s use, and that a valid gift thereof, either inter vivos or in view of death, was made by the testator to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of JamesNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. BartlettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  3. Shaw v. CampIllinois Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Herbert v. LankershimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Lefrooth v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. McConnell v. Bible InstituteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Coon v. ShryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Patterson v. ChapmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API