Legal Opinion

Coon v. Shry

California Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1930No. Docket No. Sac. 4335PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

On September 22, 1927, Vincie Boucher executed a promissory note in the sum of $2,500 in favor of appellant. At the same time she executed a mortgage on certain real property belonging to her as security for said note. The evidence is uncontraclicted that these instruments were executed for two reasons. In the first place appellant was an old friend of Dr. and Mrs. Boucher, who for many years had been very kind to them, and the Bouchers, to show their appreciation, were desirous of making a gift of the note and mortgage to appellant. In the second place, an action was then pending…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Lefrooth v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Holmes v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Nagle v. MacyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Ahern v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Estate of FairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Herbert v. LankershimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Great Falls Bank v. PardoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
  3. Beckwith v. DahlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. McConnell v. Bible InstituteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Fleming v. KaganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API