Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Crain

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 23, 1955No. Nos. 11479, 11480PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.

This case, involving an alleged injury to the libellant, a seaman, is here for the second time. Upon the first appeal we sent it back for a finding upon the question of the respondent’s prejudice by virtue of laches, 3 Cir., 1952, 195 F.2d 163. After hearing, the district court found that there was no prejudice and also followed the direction of this Court in dismissing the complaint under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 688, because it had come too late. D.C.W.D.Pa.1954, 125 F. Supp. 314.

The court entered judgment for the libellant in the action for maintenance and cure.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McAllister v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Wright v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
  3. Balla v. SladekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Taylor v. CrainCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  5. Taylor v. CrainDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1954

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bisso v. Waterways Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  2. Armstrong v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Hart v. FriedmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Bisso v. Waterways Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  5. The Pure Oil Company v. Union Barge Line CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API