Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. United States
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 23, 1959No. Civ. A. No. 22328PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN DUSEN, District Judge.
I. Findings of Fact
The trial judge makes the following Findings of Fact:
1. Henry Armstrong, the plaintiff in this action, is the administrator of the estate of Ella Armstrong, having been duly qualified and appointed as such on February 26, 1957.
2. Henry Armstrong was the husband of the decedent, Ella Armstrong, with whom he lived happily.
3. Defendant in this action is the United States of America, acting by and through the United States Post Office Department, Postal Savings System.
4. Sarah Duhart and Carrie Holmes, sisters of the deceased Ella Armstrong, are…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Henes v. McGovernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Wright v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- Sheppard v. Atlantic States Gas Co. of Pennsylvania, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Todd v. SkellySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Weaver v. WelshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Berríos v. International General Electric, (P.R., Inc.)Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963
- Mickelic v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Corbi v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
- Henry Armstrong, Administrator of the Estate of Ella Armstrong, Deceased v. United States v. Carrie Holmes and Sarah Duhart, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
- Metal Marketplace, Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.