Legal Opinion

Cvecich v. Giardino

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 20, 1940No. Civ. 11012PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $4,000 plus interest. Appellant’s sole contention is that, when the complaint was filed, the cause of action was barred by the statute of limitations. Appellant concedes executing the obligation forming the basis of the action, that she has not paid it, and that she has no defense on the merits.

The facts are not in dispute, and are as follows: On April 2, 1929, in New Jersey, appellant, a resident of New Jersey, executed her written bond wherein she agreed to pay respondent, Augusta Cvecich and her husband, both residents…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McKee v. DoddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Meyers v. Credit LyonnaisNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. Dougall v. SchulenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Foster v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Hatch v. SpoffordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Brownell Combs, Ii, Administrator C.T.A. Of the Estate of Leslie Combs, Ii, Deceased v. International Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  2. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Lewis I. Abramson World Coin Partners v. Joel F. BrownsteinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Bottineau Farmers Elevator v. Woodward-Clyde Consultants, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  5. Dew v. AppleberryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API