People v. Wheelwright
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.
Defendant, convicted of forgery, was granted probation. He appeals from the order granting probation. The order is appealable. (Pen. Code, § 1237.)
The only contention possessing merit is that the trial court of its own motion gave the following unexplained and undefined instruction: ‘1 Evidence of an oral admission or statement by the defendant ought to be viewed by [sic] caution. ’11 In the context of the facts of this case we hold that the giving of the instruction was error. But we will also hold there was no miscarriage of justice. (Cal. Const., art. VI, § 13.)
James Coleman was the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. BemisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- People v. BeverlyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Aldabe v. AldabeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. BeagleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. StepneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- People v. DawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- People v. ScherrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- People v. RainvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.