People v. Scherr
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtReppy, J.
Defendant-appellant Seherr was found guilty by a jury of two violations of section 288 and one violation of section 288a of the Penal Code. Thereafter, through appropriate proceedings, defendant was placed at Atascadero State Hospital for a 90-day diagnosis period and, after observation was found to be a mentally disordered sex offender but not amenable to treatment. Two years later he was returned to court, and, at a probation and sentence hearing, he was found still to be a mentally disordered sex offender. Proceedings were suspended, and he was placed on probation for five years on certain…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- People v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. DitsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. MansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- People v. SlocumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- People v. PerkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- People v. MansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- People v. ScherrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969