Legal Opinion

People v. Scherr

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 21, 1969No. Crim. 14515PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReppy, J.

Defendant-appellant Seherr was found guilty by a jury of two violations of section 288 and one violation of section 288a of the Penal Code. Thereafter, through appropriate proceedings, defendant was placed at Atascadero State Hospital for a 90-day diagnosis period and, after observation was found to be a mentally disordered sex offender but not amenable to treatment. Two years later he was returned to court, and, at a probation and sentence hearing, he was found still to be a mentally disordered sex offender. Proceedings were suspended, and he was placed on probation for five years on certain…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  5. People v. DitsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. MansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. People v. SlocumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. People v. PerkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. People v. MansonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. People v. ScherrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API