Legal Opinion

Flanigan v. Ames Department Store

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 4, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Justice.

This appeal arises from a decision of the Appellate Division affirming a decision of the Workers Compensation Commission that granted the employer’s petition for review. The Commission ruled that the employee was required to produce evidence of a work-search for employment at 40 hours a week to satisfy her burden of production on the employer’s petition for review because she had accepted a reinstatement position at hours that were reduced solely for economic reasons. Pursuant to Fecteau v. Rich Vale Construction, Inc., 349 A.2d 162, 166 (Me.1975), *84the employee’s post-injury…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Riley v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  2. Ray's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1922
  3. Tompkins v. Wade & Searway Construction Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  4. Fecteau v. Rich Vale Construction, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  5. Mailman v. Colonial Acres Nursing HomeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brown v. Thomas O'Connor & Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API