Flanigan v. Ames Department Store
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Justice.
This appeal arises from a decision of the Appellate Division affirming a decision of the Workers Compensation Commission that granted the employer’s petition for review. The Commission ruled that the employee was required to produce evidence of a work-search for employment at 40 hours a week to satisfy her burden of production on the employer’s petition for review because she had accepted a reinstatement position at hours that were reduced solely for economic reasons. Pursuant to Fecteau v. Rich Vale Construction, Inc., 349 A.2d 162, 166 (Me.1975), *84the employee’s post-injury…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Riley v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Ray's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1922
- Tompkins v. Wade & Searway Construction Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Fecteau v. Rich Vale Construction, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
- Mailman v. Colonial Acres Nursing HomeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brown v. Thomas O'Connor & Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996