Santos v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, J.
{¶ 1} We are asked to decide whether a suit seeking the return of funds wrongfully collected or held by the state may be properly heard in courts of common pleas, or whether, because that remedy includes the payment of money, the Court of Claims has exclusive jurisdiction. For the reasons stated below, we hold that courts of common pleas do have jurisdiction, and accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.
I
{¶ 2} Angel Santos was injured in the course of his employment. He received $121,941.03 in benefits and compensation from the Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation (“BWC”),…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Holeton v. Crouse Cartage Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
- Ohio Hospital Ass'n v. Ohio Department of Human ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Judy v. Ohio Bureau of Motor VehiclesOhio Supreme Court · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation v. McKinleyOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- Lingo v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 2014
- San Allen, Inc. v. BuehrerOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Ohio Academy of Nursing Homes v. Ohio Department of Job & Family ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Cirino v. Bur. of Workers' Comp. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.