Legal Opinion

State v. Tripathi

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 19, 2009No. TM0520598; A130229PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

In this prosecution for driving while under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), the state appeals a pretrial order excluding the results of a toxicology test that confirmed the presence of controlled substances in defendant’s urine. The trial court excluded the evidence on the ground that the state had failed to lay the proper foundation for its admission. The state appeals, arguing that, under ORS 813.131(4), because the urinalysis was conducted in an accredited or licensed toxicology laboratory, the results are admissible without further proof. We affirm.

The parties stipulated to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Davis v. O'BRIENOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State v. ChipmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. Waite v. DempseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. FongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  2. State v. Thomas (A173467)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API