Legal Opinion

State v. Chipman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 29, 2001No. B689268; A106850; Z551739; A107013; Z502235; A107014; 981149984; A107044; Z687441; A107229; Z583589; A107230; 990341576; A107508PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

This is a consolidation of seven criminal cases in which each defendant is charged with driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII). ORS 813.010. The state appeals from pretrial orders excluding evidence of defendants’ urine test results. The trial courts excluded the results on the ground that the tests were not performed according to the National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA) standards promulgated by the federal government and mandated for use in Oregon DUII cases by ORS 813.131(4) (1997). 1 We affirm as to defendants Kopp and Summers and reverse and remand the other cases to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. Thompson-SeedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. State v. StilesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  3. State v. JayneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. WarnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. State v. WestCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. State v. FongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. State v. PrewCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  5. State v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API