Legal Opinion

State v. Badzmierowski

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 23, 1992No. 92-0058PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

William Badzmierowski, the surety of defendant Thomas F. Grace, appeals from the trial court's judgment of bail forfeiture based on sec. 969.13(1), Stats. The issue is whether forfeiture can be ordered under the statute when Grace attended every court appearance but violated other conditions of his bond. Badzmierowski argues that the statute allows forfeiture only if Grace failed to appear in court. We conclude that the statute's plain meaning mandates forfeiture when Grace violates any bond condition. We affirm.

This appeal stems from Grace's arrest in Walworth county on August 24,1990 for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. County of Columbia v. BylewskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Pulsfus Poultry Farms, Inc. v. Town of LeedsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Wisconsin Electric Power Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Wolf v. J.I. Case Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1985
  5. Midland Financial Corp. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. KoreckySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  2. Clemons v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2004
  3. State v. SimmelinkCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2014
  4. State v. VangCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API