Legal Opinion

Rothe v. Hull

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 2, 1944No. 38684PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This cause comes on reassignment after rehearing. Without quotation marks, we adopt a portion of the prior opinion.

Action to recover damages in the sum of $50,000 for an assault. In substance it is alleged that plaintiff employed the defendant, an osteopathic physician and surgeon, to remove her appendix; that in performing the operation he removed both her appendix and Fallopian tubes; that the removal of the tubes was without her consent and he thereby committed an assault. The answer is a general denial. Verdict for the defendant.

The court ruled that instructions Nos. IV and VII given at…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Steele v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1915
  2. Pulitzer v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  3. Branson v. Abernathy Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  4. King Smith v. Kansas City Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  5. Poague v. KurnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Steele v. WoodsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. Devitre v. Orthopedic Center of Saint Louis, LLCSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  3. Highfill v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  4. Bootee v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  5. Mitchell v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API