Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Robinson

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 11, 1960No. 47460PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRETT, Commissioner.

William Mitchell has been awarded $15,-000 damages against the Doctors Robinson and their associates, particularly Dr. Jack DeMott, for malpractice, and the essentially meritorious problem is whether upon «■the record there is any evidence to support I the jury’s finding of negligence.

Mitchell and Dr. DeMott were boyhood schoolmates in Independence, Kansas, attended Kansas University at the same time, and were both living in Independence when Dr. DeMott began the practice of medicine there. So when in 1951, at age 35, Mitchell was beset with serious emotional problems he…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Schloendorff v. Society of the New York HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Mohr v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  4. Steele v. WoodsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  5. Hunt v. BradshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Gray v. GrunnagleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Wilson v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Natanson v. KlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  5. Woods v. BrumlopNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API