Legal Opinion

State v. Miranda

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 2, 2018No. SC19597PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

The defendant, Pedro L. Miranda, appeals 1 from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of one count of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly, (1) failed to strike the testimony of a witness who claimed that guidance from God, rather than his own recollection, had led him to identify the perpetrator in a photographic array, after the court ruled, in the jury's absence, that this testimony was inadmissible, and (2) permitted the victim's mother to testify that she had heard that the defendant was…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. KitchensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  2. Mather v. Griffin HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. State v. HamptonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  4. State v. FabricatoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  5. State v. BuhlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. Fernando V.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
  2. Eubanks v. Comm'r of Corr.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
  3. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
  4. State v. HargettConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
  5. State v. RogersConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API