Legal Opinion

Fahey v. Fahey

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1908No. 5352; No. 3001 C. APublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver. Ron. Owen E. Le Fevre, Judge. Action by Jane. Fabey against Tbomas Fahey and J. F. Gtirardot, and from a decree in favor of plaintiff, William Fahey, Mary Girardot (substituted as parties on- the death of defendant Thomas Fahey) and J. F. Girardot, bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Maxwell

Defendant in error, Jane Fahey, instituted this action for separate maintenance against her husband, Thomas Fahey, to set aside a conveyance of real estate made by the husband to plaintiff in error Girardot in fraud of her rights, and to restrain the husband and Girardot from disposing of the property during the pendency of the suit.

The pleadings presented issues upon which the court made findings of fact in substance as follows:

That the allegations of the complaint were true; that at the time of the rendition of the decree, plaintiff was living separate and apart from her husband, on account…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Daniels v. DanielsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
  2. Strong v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  3. Chase v. ChaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
  4. Davidson v. BurkeIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  5. In re PopejoySupreme Court of Colorado · 1899

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. MusimSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  2. Thuringer v. TraftonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1914
  3. Masterson v. OgdenWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Linker v. LinkerColorado Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. Elmer v. ElmerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API